Russian trademark attorneys

Trademark Non-Use Cancellation in Russia

We represent interested parties seeking full or partial early termination of unused Russian trademarks and international registrations protected in Russia, and trademark owners defending their rights with evidence of genuine use.

What we handle

Our work covers the complete Article 1486 route, from standing and the pre-action proposal through evidence, proceedings and the resulting register update.

Assessment
A

Conflict and standing review

We assess the challenged mark, relevant goods and services, the client's commercial interest and whether non-use cancellation is the right route.

Pre-action
P

Mandatory proposal

We prepare and serve the statutory proposal to abandon or assign the rights, check the required addresses and calculate the filing window.

Claim
C

Cancellation proceedings

We prepare and conduct the claim before the Intellectual Property Court for all or selected goods and services.

Defence
D

Defence of the registration

For trademark owners, we test standing, audit the relevant period and build a dated evidence file showing genuine commercial use.

Scope
G/S

Partial cancellation strategy

We map the claimant's interest and the owner's evidence to the exact registered goods and services instead of treating a class as one unit.

Protection
IM

Interim measures and follow-up

Where strict conditions are met, we consider measures protecting a pending application and then coordinate judgment and register follow-up.

Who can bring a non-use claim

Standing is substantive, not formal. The claimant must show a real and lawful commercial reason why the challenged protection should be removed.

An interested person is requiredThe claim is available only to a party whose commercial position is affected by the registration for the challenged goods or services.
Relevant commercial fieldExisting business in the same or a related field, or concrete preparatory steps to enter it, can support standing.
Planned designationThe claimant should intend to use an identical or confusingly similar sign, with or without registering it as a trademark.
An application alone is not enoughA Russian trademark application is useful evidence, but without a genuine commercial plan it does not by itself establish interest.
A live conflict may matterA refusal, opposition position or infringement dispute can strengthen standing when it demonstrates a lawful need to use the designation.
Full or partial challengeInterest and evidence are assessed for the particular goods and services challenged, so the result may differ across the specification.

A short, unforgiving pre-action sequence

The statutory timetable must be built around the correct registration, owner, addresses and goods or services. A defect can require the sequence to start again.

1. Confirm the opening date

The proposal may be sent only when the challenged protection has reached the statutory age. We verify the registration history and calculate the relevant three-year period.

2. Serve every required address

The proposal should go to the owner and the addresses required by the Russian or international trademark register. Email alone is not a reliable substitute.

3. Wait two months

The proposal offers the owner the statutory choices: abandon the challenged rights or conclude an assignment with the interested party.

4. File within 30 days

Once the two-month period expires, the claim must be filed during the following 30 days. A missed or defective sequence normally requires a new proposal and fresh dates.

What counts as trademark use

The owner bears the burden of proving actual use during the relevant period. The court tests the evidence against each challenged item in the registration.

Actual, not token, useThe evidence should show genuine commercial use directly connected with putting goods or services into circulation in Russia.
The correct three-year periodDocuments outside the period may provide context, but they do not replace dated evidence covering the statutory window.
Each named item mattersUse for one product does not normally preserve protection for every homogeneous product or service listed in the registration.
Use under the owner's controlUse by the owner, a licensee or another person acting under the owner's control may preserve the registration.
Altered form of the markUse with changes can count only when the distinctive essence remains recognizable and the registered scope is not limited.
Independent obstaclesThe court may consider circumstances beyond the owner's control that objectively prevented use during the relevant period.

Build the evidence around the statutory test

A large file is not automatically a strong file. The documents must answer the correct question for the correct party, goods or services and dates.

Claimant: interest and intended use

Business records, launch preparations, correspondence, market activity and the blocking registration or refusal should establish a concrete commercial need.

Claimant: notice and timetable

Registry extracts, address checks, postal evidence, delivery records and a precise deadline calculation prove compliance with the pre-action route.

Owner: dated commercial use

Products, packaging, invoices, contracts, delivery records, advertising and online materials should be tied to Russia, the relevant period and exact goods or services.

Owner: chain of authorised use

Licences, distribution arrangements, instructions and control records help connect third-party activity to the trademark owner.

Process for foreign counsel

We keep the sequence visible from the first assessment through judgment and the resulting change to the Russian trademark record.

01

Conflict review

We review the registration or IR, relevant goods and services, commercial background and any linked application or dispute.

02

Standing and evidence

We test interest, relevant dates and the available claimant or owner evidence, then recommend the practical route.

03

Proposal

For a claim, we prepare and serve the mandatory proposal and docket the two-month and 30-day periods.

04

IP Court proceedings

We prepare the pleadings and evidence, conduct hearings and report settlement or procedural options as the case develops.

05

Judgment and record

We report the outcome, advise on review options and coordinate the resulting Rospatent or international-register follow-up.

Possible outcomes

The court may terminate protection for all challenged items, narrow the specification, or maintain the registration. Termination takes effect when the judgment enters into legal force.

Full terminationProtection ends for all goods and services covered by the claim where standing is established and qualifying use is not proved.
Partial terminationThe registration remains in force for supported items but ends for goods or services where the claimant succeeds and use is not shown.
Registration maintainedThe claim may fail because standing, the pre-action route or non-use is not established, or because the owner proves qualifying use.

Legal references

Key statutory provisions and Supreme Court materials used for this service page.

Current as of 18 July 2026. Procedural requirements should be checked against the facts and register record when instructions are received. This page is general information, not a legal opinion on a particular matter.

Need Russian counsel for a non-use case?

Send us the challenged registration or IR, relevant goods and services, the conflicting application or commercial background, any correspondence and the current deadline. We will assess standing, sequence, evidence and practical options.