Conflict and standing review
We assess the challenged mark, relevant goods and services, the client's commercial interest and whether non-use cancellation is the right route.
Russian trademark attorneys
We represent interested parties seeking full or partial early termination of unused Russian trademarks and international registrations protected in Russia, and trademark owners defending their rights with evidence of genuine use.
Our work covers the complete Article 1486 route, from standing and the pre-action proposal through evidence, proceedings and the resulting register update.
We assess the challenged mark, relevant goods and services, the client's commercial interest and whether non-use cancellation is the right route.
We prepare and serve the statutory proposal to abandon or assign the rights, check the required addresses and calculate the filing window.
We prepare and conduct the claim before the Intellectual Property Court for all or selected goods and services.
For trademark owners, we test standing, audit the relevant period and build a dated evidence file showing genuine commercial use.
We map the claimant's interest and the owner's evidence to the exact registered goods and services instead of treating a class as one unit.
Where strict conditions are met, we consider measures protecting a pending application and then coordinate judgment and register follow-up.
Standing is substantive, not formal. The claimant must show a real and lawful commercial reason why the challenged protection should be removed.
The statutory timetable must be built around the correct registration, owner, addresses and goods or services. A defect can require the sequence to start again.
The proposal may be sent only when the challenged protection has reached the statutory age. We verify the registration history and calculate the relevant three-year period.
The proposal should go to the owner and the addresses required by the Russian or international trademark register. Email alone is not a reliable substitute.
The proposal offers the owner the statutory choices: abandon the challenged rights or conclude an assignment with the interested party.
Once the two-month period expires, the claim must be filed during the following 30 days. A missed or defective sequence normally requires a new proposal and fresh dates.
The owner bears the burden of proving actual use during the relevant period. The court tests the evidence against each challenged item in the registration.
A large file is not automatically a strong file. The documents must answer the correct question for the correct party, goods or services and dates.
Business records, launch preparations, correspondence, market activity and the blocking registration or refusal should establish a concrete commercial need.
Registry extracts, address checks, postal evidence, delivery records and a precise deadline calculation prove compliance with the pre-action route.
Products, packaging, invoices, contracts, delivery records, advertising and online materials should be tied to Russia, the relevant period and exact goods or services.
Licences, distribution arrangements, instructions and control records help connect third-party activity to the trademark owner.
We keep the sequence visible from the first assessment through judgment and the resulting change to the Russian trademark record.
We review the registration or IR, relevant goods and services, commercial background and any linked application or dispute.
We test interest, relevant dates and the available claimant or owner evidence, then recommend the practical route.
For a claim, we prepare and serve the mandatory proposal and docket the two-month and 30-day periods.
We prepare the pleadings and evidence, conduct hearings and report settlement or procedural options as the case develops.
We report the outcome, advise on review options and coordinate the resulting Rospatent or international-register follow-up.
The court may terminate protection for all challenged items, narrow the specification, or maintain the registration. Termination takes effect when the judgment enters into legal force.
Key statutory provisions and Supreme Court materials used for this service page.
Current as of 18 July 2026. Procedural requirements should be checked against the facts and register record when instructions are received. This page is general information, not a legal opinion on a particular matter.
Send us the challenged registration or IR, relevant goods and services, the conflicting application or commercial background, any correspondence and the current deadline. We will assess standing, sequence, evidence and practical options.