Case assessment and strategy
Rights audit, infringement analysis, standing, defendant mapping, procedural options, remedies and a practical budget.
Russian IP litigators
We represent foreign right holders and counsel in Russian disputes involving unauthorized use of trademarks, patents, industrial designs, copyright, software, domain names, online listings and trade secrets.
Our work starts with the commercial objective and carries the dispute from evidence preservation and pre-action strategy through judgment and enforcement.
Rights audit, infringement analysis, standing, defendant mapping, procedural options, remedies and a practical budget.
Test purchases, specimens, online records, notarial inspections, title documents, sales evidence and expert preparation.
Cease-and-desist letters, mandatory monetary demands, platform notices, settlement terms and controlled sell-off arrangements.
Applications to prohibit specified sales or online acts, arrest goods or equipment and preserve evidence where urgency can be shown.
Claims and defences, hearings, procedural applications, court-appointed experts, confidential materials and settlement.
Appellate and cassation strategy, recoverable costs, enforcement writs and implementation of injunctions and monetary awards.
We build the infringement test around the protected object, the accused act and the commercial setting in which the right is being used.
A warning letter can cause listings, stock and records to disappear. The right, evidence and remedy theory should be tested first.
Russia has no broad US-style discovery. The claimant should secure the evidence it controls and make focused requests for identifiable records held by others.
Orders, receipts, payment records, delivery labels, unboxing records, packaging and retained samples establish who sold what, where and when.
Notarial website inspection can preserve changing content. Platform records may support seller identity, sales volume, stock and supplier evidence.
Court-appointed experts are common in patent, software, technical copyright and design disputes. The questions and comparison materials should be planned early.
A court may prohibit defined acts, arrest goods or equipment or preserve evidence where the claim, urgency and proportionality are adequately supported.
We keep the file structured for overseas teams: clear merits advice, an evidence plan, realistic budgets and reporting that can be forwarded to the client.
We review the rights, accused conduct, parties, evidence, commercial objective and urgent dates.
We provide a merits assessment, procedural options, proposed team, assumptions and staged fee estimate.
We preserve evidence, refine the defendant map and send the required demands or targeted notices.
We file and defend the case, seek interim relief, manage experts and report each material development.
We handle settlement, appeals, cassation, cost recovery and implementation of the final relief.
Most business-to-business IP infringement disputes follow the regional commercial court system. Timing changes with complexity, foreign service, experts and interim applications.
The court decides infringement, injunctions, damages or compensation and other civil remedies. Straightforward cases often take about 6-12 months in practice.
The appeal may revisit both facts and law within procedural limits and can consider additional evidence where the statutory conditions are met.
For commercial infringement cases, the IP Court acts as the first cassation court and focuses on material errors of law and procedure.
A further complaint may be considered by the Judicial Chamber for Economic Disputes if a Supreme Court judge transfers it for hearing.
The claim should ask for relief that is specific enough to enforce and supported by the available evidence and commercial objective.
Damages may include proven actual loss and lost profit. The claimant must establish the amount, causation and why the loss resulted from the infringement.
For IP rights expressly covered by the Civil Code, compensation can replace damages. Actual loss need not be proved, but infringement and the selected calculation still require support under the 2026 framework.
Key statutory and judicial materials used for this service page.
Current as of 18 July 2026. Court fees, procedural deadlines and special payment rules should be checked for the specific dispute. This page is general information, not a legal opinion on a particular matter.
Send us the protected-right details, evidence of the accused conduct, known defendants, commercial objective and any approaching deadline. We will return a preliminary case view, proposed evidence plan and fee estimate.