Test whether the cited mark was genuinely used
Our investigation showed that, despite its earlier reputation, the cited mark had not been used in Russia for a considerable period.
Case study · Russia · Trademarks
We used an early termination claim for non-use to create a negotiated route past the cited mark and secure registration for the client’s full list of goods.
The obstacle
Rospatent issued a preliminary refusal against the client’s application, finding the mark confusingly similar to an earlier registration owned by a German retail group.
An initial attempt to obtain a letter of consent did not succeed, leaving the client without a direct route to registration for the planned product line.
Our strategy
We investigated the cited mark’s use, established the client’s commercial interest and filed before the Court for Intellectual Property Rights.
Our investigation showed that, despite its earlier reputation, the cited mark had not been used in Russia for a considerable period.
We collected evidence connecting the pending application and planned product launch to early termination of the cited protection for non-use.
We filed the non-use claim before the Court for Intellectual Property Rights, bringing the unresolved citation into an active legal process.
The parties reached an agreement under which the German company provided irrevocable consent to registration and use of the client’s mark.
Result
We submitted the agreement and consent to Rospatent, eliminating the basis for refusal and securing protection for the complete list of goods sought by the client.
Key point
A non-use action does not always need to end in judgment. Here, the filed claim changed the negotiating position and produced the consent needed to overcome the refusal.
View all casesDiscuss a matter
Send us the application, refusal and cited registration for a standing and non-use assessment.